Changepoint Detection in Multivariate Climate Time Series: Performance Assessment of Hybrid PELT+RF Against Baseline PELT

  • A. A. Ademuwagun Department of Basic Science and General Studies, Federal College of Forestry Mechanization Afaka, Kaduna, Nigeria.
  • H. U. Yahaya Department of Statistics, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
  • S. O. Adams Department of Statistics, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.
Keywords: Change Point Detection (CPD), Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT), Random Forest Proximity Anomaly Scores (RF).

Abstract

The research studied the performance of Hybrid Pruned Exact Linear Time and Random Forest Proximity Anomaly Scores (PELT+RF) against Baseline PELT in accurately detecting change points in Climate time series Data using simulation. The research adopts a Monte Carlo simulation framework to develop, implement and evaluate a hybrid change-point detection technique that combines the Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm with machine learning anomaly detection method (RF). The hybrid approach Pruned Exact Linear Time + Random Forest Proximity Anomaly Scores (PELT+RF) is compared against baseline PELT using simulated multivariate climate datasets. Across small, moderate, and large sample sizes, the same directional patterns persist- temperature and humidity increase while rainfall decreases with more breaks. However, larger samples make the regime shifts more distinct and less noisy. This finding underscores that robust detection methods must perform well not only in large datasets but also in small samples, where noisy signals make breaks harder to capture. Enhanced detection algorithms are therefore vital for early warning in short observational records or regional climate data with limited length. PELT+RF showed slightly stronger precision and F1-scores in small-sample, high-change scenarios, making it the better performer in noisy and data-limited environments. On balance, PELT+RF emerged as a strong hybrid in practical, small-sample climate contexts, where data scarcity and noise are common. Its incremental improvements in precision and F1 are particularly valuable for regional climate monitoring and early-warning systems. This Study carried out a Performance Assessment on the developed, implemented and evaluated Hybrid change-point detection framework which integrates the Pruned Exact Linear Time (PELT) algorithm with machine learning anomaly detection method (Random Forest proximity Based Anomaly Scores) for robust identification of structural breaks in multivariate climate time series against Baseline PELT Algorithm of which PELT+RF emerged a strong Hybrid. For instance, at four change points with n=70n=70 , PELT+RF achieves a precision of 0.1981 compared to 0.1919 for PELT, alongside a higher F1- score (0.3302 vs. 0.3217). Relative to all other alternatives for Change Point Detection, the Hybrid PELT+RF approach balanced computational efficiency, interpretability, and robustness. It retains PELT's exact segmentation while using ML scorers to capture multivariate, nonlinear anomalies.

References

Gomez C., White J.C & Wulder M.A. (2011). Characterizing the state and process of change in a dynamic forest environment using hierarchical spatio-temporal segmentation. Remote sensing Environment, Vol 115, pp 1665-1679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.02.025.

Ademuwagun A.A., Suleiman R.T., Olumuyiwa S.A., Oyedeji M.B. & Afolabi R.T (2024). Application of Change point Analysis to Nigerian Rainfall Data. The Journal of the Mathematical Association of Nigeria Ogun State (JOMANOGS) Mathematical Sciences and Education series Vol 6 (2) Pg 94-108.

Killick, R., Fearnhead, P., & Eckley, I. A. (2012). Optimal detection of changepoints with a linear computational cost. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 107(500), 1590-1598. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2012.737745.

Liu, F. T., Ting, K. M., & Zhou, Z.- H. (2008). Isolation forest. In 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (pp. 413-422). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdm.2008.17.

Rhodes, J. S. (2023). Supervised Manifold Learning via Random Forest Geometry-Preserving Proximities*. 2023 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/sampta59647.2023.10301399

IPCC. (2019). Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157964.019.

Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., & Sugihara, G. (2009). Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature, 461(7260), 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227.

deYoung, B., Barange, M., Beaugrand, G., Harris, R., Perry, R. I., Scheffer, M., & Werner, F. (2008). Regime shifts in marine ecosystems: Detection, prediction and management. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(7), 402-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.008.

Lenton, T. M. (2013). Environmental tipping points. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 38, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102511-084654.

Page, E. S. (1954). Continuous inspection schemes. Biometrika, 41(1/2), 100-115. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333009.

Hawkins, D. M. (2001). Fitting multiple change-point models to data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 37(3), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-9473(00)00068-2.

Bai, J. & Perron, P. (2003). Computation and analysis of multiple Structural change Models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.659.

Thomas, A. M., Jauch, M., & Matteson, D. S. (2025). Bayesian Changepoint Detection via Logistic Regression and the Topological Analysis of Image Series. Technometrics, 67(4), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2025.2515928

Reeves, J., Chen, J., Wang, X. L., Lund, R., & Lu, Q. Q. (2007). A review and comparison of changepoint detection techniques for climate data. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46(6), 900-915. https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2493.1

Beaulieu, C., Chen, J., & Sarmiento, J. L. (2012). Change-point analysis as a tool to detect abrupt climate variations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 370(1962), 1228-1249. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2011.0383.

Haynes, K., Eckley, I. A., & Fearnhead, P. (2017). Computationally efficient changepoint detection for a range of penalties. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26(1), 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2015.1116445.

Killick, R., & Eckley, I. A. (2014). Changepoint: An R package for changepoint analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 58(3), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v058.i03.

Truong, C., Oudre, L., & Vayatis, N. (2020). Selective review of offline change point detection methods. Signal Processing, 167, 107299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2019.107299.

Zwiers, F. W., & von Storch, H. (2004). On the role of statistics in climate research. International Journal of Climatology, 24(6), 665-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1027.

Sinroza, P., & Shaikh, M. (2020). A review on Climate Change Impact Analysis using Statistical tools. 25th International Conference on Hydraulics, Water Resources and River Engineering Hydro 2020 International NIT Rourkela, India, 16-18 December, 2020

Musaev, A., Grigoriev, D., & Kolosov, M. (2024). Adaptive algorithms for change point detection in financial time series. AIMS Mathematics, 9(12), 35238-35263. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20241674

Malinowski, J., Kostrzewa, M., Balcerek, M., Tomczuk, W. & Szwabinski, J. (2025). CINNAMON: A hybrid approach to change point detection and parameter estimation in single-particle tracking data. Journal of Physics: Photonics, 7(3), 035008. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7647/add826

Xu, R., Song, Z., Wu, J., Wang, C. & Zhou, S. (2025). Change-point detection with deep learning: A review. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 12(1), 154-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-025-4109-z

Martinsson, J., Mogren, O., Sandsten, M. & Virtanen, T. (2024). From Weak to Strong Sound Event Labels using Adaptive Change-Point Detection and Active Learning. 2024 32nd European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), 902-906. https://doi.org/10.23919/eusipco63174.2024.10715098

Dong, C., Huston, L & Kemter, M. (2024). Sustainability and climate trends to watch 2024. Morgan Stanley Capital International Environmental Social and Governance. msc.com

Onyeka-Ubaka, J. N., Halid, M. A., & Ogundej, R. K. (2021). Optimal Stochastic forecast Models of Rainfall in South West Region of Nigeria. International Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Optimization theory and Applications Vol 7 No 2 PP 1-20
Published
2026-04-05
How to Cite
Ademuwagun, A. A., Yahaya, H. U., & Adams, S. O. (2026). Changepoint Detection in Multivariate Climate Time Series: Performance Assessment of Hybrid PELT+RF Against Baseline PELT. International Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Optimization: Theory and Applications, 12(1), 59 - 83. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20385508
Section
Articles